AD ALTA
JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Gubová, 2016). The standard is applicable to each industry and
its requirements are always supplementary to requirements for
the service or product itself (Jambor, 2013). Its combination with the
ESG standards will allow the system to focus more on the sector of
higher education in compliance with the requirements of the
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education
(ENQA), European Students’ Union (ESU), European Association
of Institutions in Higher Education (EURASHE) and the European
University Association (EUA). The main goal of the Standards and
Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education
Area (ESG) is to contribute to the common understanding of quality
assurance for learning and teaching across geographical borders
among all stakeholders.
The focus of the ESG standards is on quality assurance related to
learning and teaching in higher education, including the learning
environment and relevant links to research and innovation.
Institutions of higher education should implement principles and
practices in order to ensure and improve the quality of education
(study programmes) and other activities. The term “programme”
refers to the provision of higher education in its broadest sense,
including education that is not part of a programme leading to a
formal degree, i.e. all activities aimed at achieving goals in education
that are supported by the institution. The ESG work (similarly to
ISO 9001) with stakeholders´ requirements, whereby stakeholders
represent all players within an institution, including students and
staff, as well as external stakeholders such as employers, and external
partners of an institution. According to the ESG, quality of
education is primarily the result of an interaction between teachers,
students and institutional learning environment. Quality assurance
should lead to the creation of a learning environment in which the
content of study programmes, learning opportunities and learning
facilities fit their purpose. Essential to all quality assurance activities
are two objectives: accountability, and quality improvement. The
term “quality assurance” is used to describe all activities within the
continuous improvement cycle (i.e. quality assurance activities and
development activities).
From a long-term perspective, the application of ISO 9001 in
institutions of education is increasing worldwide. The year 2016
introduced a revision and witnessed a 16% growth in education
certificates. Attenuation related to ISO 9001 in 2015 was
recorded across all sectors. It was linked to the announced
revision published in September 2015.
Figure 1. ISO 9001 Certificates in education organizations
2. TnUAD Quality Assurance Approach
One year after implementing the integrated system within the
Trenčín University environment and successful recertification, a
further shift in performance reflected in evaluation results of
study programmes can be observed.
At the integration of both standards we relied on our experience with
ISO 9001:2008 and ESG 2009 systems (which were part of the
accreditation criteria of Internal Quality Assurance System in
compliance with Article 87a of the Act 131/2002 Coll. On Higher
Education and Accreditation criteria). The reason for choosing this
particular concept lied in the experience with maintaining the quality
system and improving the quality of higher education in the Slovak
Republic. Particular emphasis was placed on the need for regular
external system assessment and external feedback. Framework of the
system consists of the ISO 9001 structure and high-quality external
certification (Myna, Yarka, Peleschyshyn, Bilushchak, 2016). The
system is complex, with rigorous management of the main processes
and improvement cycles and is conditioned by regular internal as
well as external assessment. It also requires regular feedback from
all stakeholders and a demonstrable improvement (Jambor, 2013).
All new or revised requirements of ISO 9001:2015 and the majority
of ESG 2015 requirements were implemented in 2016. Currently, the
focus is on activities related to the redesign of study programmes in
compliance with the national qualification framework in force, as
well as on research and classification of student-centered learning
and teaching processes in compliance with the timetable of project
no. 001TnUAD-2-3/2016 (Attard, Iorio, Geven, Santa, 2010).
2.1 Review of higher education internal and external aspects
When determining core strategic, objectives of the University,
and its individual faculties, we designed regular monitoring and
reviewing processes for internal and external aspects that are
relevant to the institution´s strategic direction and that influence
its ability to provide education and related services. Each
department reviewed internal and external aspects and the way
they influence the unit´s future direction. The results were
incorporated into regular reviews of internal quality assurance
system and served both as the basis for revision of the
University´s vision and objectives and as an input to the
management of internal and external risks of the main processes.
Figure 2. TnUAD SWOT results
- 88 -