AD ALTA
JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
thinking are, however, of outstanding importance in
understanding the learning content.
In the next phase of the research we wish to explore what results
will be achieved during their first-year studies by the students
who have reached good results in the inductive test. Do good
study results follow from developed inductive reasoning and
thinking? And likely: are poor test results able to predict learning
difficulties?
Literature
1. Adey, P., Shayer, M.: Really raising standards: Cognitive
intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge,
1994, ISBN 978-0-415-10145-5
2. Akkerman, S. F., Meijer, P. C.: A dialogical approach to
conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 27(2), 2011, 308–319
3. Amsel, E., Moshman, D.: Logical and Hypothetical Reasoning
in Adolescence Development of. In: Wright, J. D. (Ed.):
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
14, Oxford: Elsevier, 2015, 306-312. ISBN 978-0-08-097087-5,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23089-4
4. Armoni M, Gal-Ezer J.: Non-determinism: An abstract
concept in computer science studies. Computer Science
Education, 17(4), 2007, 243-262.
5. Bennedsen, J., Caspersen, M. E.: Abstraction ability as an
indicator of success for learning object-oriented programming?
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(2), 2006, 39-43.
6. Blair, C.: How similar are fluid cognition and general
intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid
cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behavior and
Brain Sciences, 29(2), 2006, 109-125.
7. Blakemore, S. J.: Imaging brain development: the adolescent
brain. Neuroimage, 61, 2012, 397–406.
8. Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Halford, G. S.: The processing loads of
young children's and teachers' representations of place value and
implications for teaching. Mathematics Education Research
Journal, 4(1), 1992, 1-23.
9. Bowman, N. A.: College diversity experiences and cognitive
development: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research,
80(1), 2010, 4-33
10. Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., Strother, S., Jesse, D., Sutton,
J.: The Effects of Professional Development on Elementary
Students’ Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Curriculum and
Teaching. 2016, 5(2), 95-108.
11. Brestenská, B., Fehér, Z., Jaruska, L., Juhász, Gy., Puskás,
A., Szarka, K. 2019. Teacher trainees attitude towards the
implementation of selected web-based applications in teacher
training. In: CBU International Conference Proceedings 2019 :
Innovations in Science and Education : March 20-22, 2019,
Prague, Czech Republic: Innovations in Science and Education :
March 20-
22, 2019, Prague, Czech Republic. Petr Hájek, Ondřej
Vít. Praha: CBU Research Institute, 2019, S. 387-392. ISBN
978-80-907722-0-5.
12. Cervetti, G., N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P., D.
Goldschmidt, P.: The impact of an integrated approach to
science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 2012, 631-658
13. Cohen, E., Smith-Gold, D. A.: Your students cognitive
functioning: An important factor in readiness to learn. Williams,
J., Felber, S., Vaughn, D. (Eds.): Proceedings of the Annual
Conference of Western. College Reading Association, 11, 1978,
31-34, https://doi.org/10.1080/24699365.1978.11669666
14. Darwish, A. H.: The abstract thinking levels of the science-
education students in Gaza universities. Asia-Pacific Forum on
Science Learning and Teaching, 15(2), 2014, ERIC Number:
EJ1053321, p24.
15. Denson, C. D., Hailey, C., Stallworth, C. A., Householder, D.
L.: Benefits of informal learning environments: a focused
examination of STEM-based program environments. Journal of
STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(1), 2015, 11-15.
16. Desimone, L.: A Primer on Effective Professional
Development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 2011, 68-71.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200616
17. Devi, K. S.: Application of Fundamental Mathematical
Structure using a Self Game for Cognitive Development in
Children. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research
and Development, 3(3), 2019, 843-846.
18. Dumontheil, I.: Development of abstract thinking during
childhood and adolescence: The role of rostrolateral prefrontal
cortex. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 10, 2014, 57-76.
19. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K.,
Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Brooks-Gunn, J.: School readiness
and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6),
2007, 1428-1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
20. Ferrer, E., O’Hare, E. D., Bunge, S. A.: Fluid reasoning and
the developing brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3, 2009, 46-51.
Franzak, J. K.: Developing a teacher identity: the impact of
critical friends practice on the student teacher. National Council
of Teachers of English, 34(4), 2002, 258–280.
21. Georgiev, N.: Item Analysis of C, D and E Series from
Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices with Item Response
Theory Two-Parameter Logistic Model. Europe’s Journal of
Psychology, 4(3), 2008, https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v4i3.431
22. Goswami, U.: Analogical Reasoning in Children. In:
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., Kokinov, B. N. (eds.): The
Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science.
Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992, 437-470, ISBN 978-0-262-
57139-5
23. Gottfredson, L. S.: Why g matters: the complexity of
everyday life. Intelligence, 24(1), 1997, 79-132
24. Inhelder, B., Piaget, J.: An essay on the construction of
formal operational structures. The growth of logical thinking:
From childhood to adolescence. London: Routledge and Kegan
Paul, 1958, ISBN 978-0-415-21002-7
25. Iqbal, H. M., Shayer, M.: Accelerating the Development of
Formal Thinking in Pakistan Secondary School Students:
Achievement Effects and Professional Development Issues.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 2000, 259-274.
26. Jacobs, P. I., Vandeventer, M.: Progressive Matrices: An
experimental, developmental, nonfactorial analysis. Perceptual
and Motor Skills, 27(3), 1968, 759-766.
27. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., Locuniak, M. N.:
Early math matters: kindergarten number competence and later
mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 2009,
850-867.
28. Kane, H., Brand, Ch.: The importance of Spearman’s g. As a
psychometric, social, and educational construct. The Occidental
Quarterly, 3(1), 2003, 7-30.
29. Kitchen, J. A., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M.: The impact of
college-and university-run high school summer programs on
students’ end of high school STEM career aspirations. Science
Education, 102(3), 2018, 529–547.
30. Klauer, K. J., Phye, G. D.: Inductive Reasoning: A Training
Approach. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 2008, 85-
123.
31. Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., Borko, H.: Mathematics
Professional Development: Critical Features for Developing
Leadership Skills and Building Teachers’ Capacity. Mathematics
Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 2011, 115-136.
32. Kong, X., Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H.: The association
between science summer camps and career interest in science
and engineering. International Journal of Science Education,
4(1), 2014, 54–65.
33. Kramer, J.: Is abstraction the key to computing?
Communications of the ACM, 50(4),
2007, 36-42,
https://doi.org/10.1145/1232743.1232745
34. Kuhn, D., Langer, J., Kohlberg, L., Haan, N., S.: The
development of formal operations in logical and moral
judgment. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 95 (1), 1977, 97-
188.
35. Kucheman, D.: Algebra. In: Hart, K. M. (Ed.): Children’s
Understanding of Mathematics, 11-16, 1981, London: John
Murray. ISBN 978-1-905-20002-3
36. Kusmaryono, I, Suyitno, H., Dwijanto, D., Dwidayati, N.:
Analysis of Abstract Reasoning from Grade 8 Students in
Mathematical Problem Solving with SOLO Taxonomy Guide.
Infinity Journal, 7(2), 2018, 69-82.
37. Mackintosh, N. J.: IQ and human intelligence. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1998, ISBN 978-0-199-58559-5
- 144 -