AD ALTA
JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Literature:
1. Gartner. Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.
2017.
https://www.gartner.com/doc/3746618/magic-quadrant-
disaster-recovery-service. (Accessed 13 January 2019).
2. Urbanec, J. and Urbancova, H. Adoption of Business
Continuity Management Standards in Czech Organizations.
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica. 45(1). 2014. 66-74 pp.DOI:
10.7160/sab.2014.450109
3. Columbus Technical College. Business Continuity Plan 2018-
2019. 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.columbustech.edu
/skins/userfiles/files/2018-2019%20Business%20Continuity
%20Plan.pdf.
4.
Podaras, A., Antlova, K., & Motejlek, J. Information
Management Tools for Implementing an Efficient Enterprise
Business Continuity Strategy. E M Ekon. Manag. 19. 2016. 165-
182 pp. http://dx.doi.org10.15240/tul/001/2016-1-012 .
5.
Podaras, A. (2018). Measuring the Accuracy Levels
Regarding the Dual Business Function Criticality Classifier.
IEEE Access. 6. 2018. 41598-41606 pp. doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2860976.
6. Rowan University. Business Continuity Management Policy.
2014).
https://confluence.rowan.edu/display/POLICY/Busines
s+Continuity+Management. (Accessed 9 January 2019).
7. Pace University. Security and Emergency Management.
Business Continuity Planning. 2020. Retrieved from:
https://www.pace.edu/security-emergency-management/bus
iness-continuity-planning .
8. Srinivas Acharyulu, P.V. & Seetharamaiah, P. A Framework
for Safety Automation of Safety-Critical Systems Operations.
Safety Science. 77. 2015. 133-142 pp. doi:
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.017.
9. Torabi, S. A., Rezaei, H., & Sahebjamnia, N. A New
Framework for Business Impact Analysis in Business Continuity
Management (with a Case Study). Safety Science. 68. 2014. 309
– 323 pp. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.017.
10. Šimonová, S., & Šprync, O. Proactive IT/IS monitoring for
business continuity planning. E M Ekon. Manag. 14. 57-65 pp.
2011.
11. Sahebjamnia, N., Torabi, S. A., & Mansouri, A.Integrated
Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning: Towards
Organizational Resilience. European Journal of Operational
Research. Vol. 242. No. 1. 2014. pp. 261-273. ISSN: 0377-2217.
12. Engemann, K. J., & Henderson, D.M. Business Continuity
and Risk Management: Essentials for an Organizational
Resilience. Rothstein Associates Inc., Connecticut, USA, 2012.
13. Starr, R. Enterprise Resilience: Managing Risk in the
Networked Economy. Available at: http://www.boozallen.co
m/content/dam/boozallen/media/file/Enterprise_Resilience_Rep
ort.pdf
,
14. Karner, G. Use Case Points—Resource Estimation for
objectory Projects. Objective Systems SF AB, 1993.
2003 (Accessed 8 February 2019).
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.604.7
842&rep=rep1&type=pdf, (accessed 8 December 2018).
15. Gibson, D. (2010). Mitigating Risk with a Business Impact
Analysis. Managing Risks in Information Systems, second ed.,
Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, NJ, USA. 2010.
16. Yadav, M.L., & Roychoudhury, B. Handling missing values:
a study of popular imputation packages in R. Knowl. Based Syst.
160. 2018. 104-118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.012.
17.
Golfarelli, M., & Rizzi, S. Data warehouse design. Modern
principles and methodologies. McGraw-Hill, 2009.
18. Romero, O., & Abelló, A. A Framework for
Multidimensional Design of Data Warehouses from Ontologies.
Data Knowl. Eng. 69. 2010. 1138–1157 pp.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2010.07.007.
19. Caniupán, M., Bravo, L., & Hurtado, C. A. Repairing
Inconsistent Dimensions in Data Warehouses. Data Knowl. Eng,
79–80. 2012. 17–39 pp.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2012.04.002.
20. Vaisman, A., & Zimanyi, E.
Data Warehouse Systems:
Design and Implementation
. Data Centric Systems and
Applications. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2014.
21. Yao, M.X
. Granularity Measures and Complexity Measures
of Partition-Based Granular Structures
. Knowl. Based Syst.
163. 2019. 885-897 pp. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kno
sys.2018.10.015
22. Pedrycz, W., Al-Hmouz, R., Morfeq, A. and Balamash, A.S.
Building Granular Fuzzy Decision Support Systems.
Knowl.
Based Syst., 58 (2014) 3-10 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knos
ys.2013.07.022.
23. Welling, L., & Thomson, L. PHP and MYSQL Web
Development. Fifth ed. Addison-Wesley. USA, 2017.
24. Brown, T.B., Butters, K., & Panda, S. Jump Start HTML5:
Get Up to Speed With HTML5 in a Weekend. First ed., Sitepoint
Pty. Ltd, Autralia, 2014.
25. Sohrabi, M. K., & Azgomi, H. (2019). Evolutionary Game
Theory Approach to Materialized View Selection in Data
Warehouses. Knowl. Based Syst. 163. 2019. 558-571 pp.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.09.012.
26. Rahlf, T. Data for Everybody. Data Visualization with R:
100 Examples. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland,
2017. pp. 1–4. ISBN 978-3-030-28443-5.
27. Breiman L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. & Stone, C.J.,
Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall. New
York, USA. 1984.
28. Machine Learning Mastery. A gentle introduction to k-fold cross-
validation. 2018. Retrieved from: https://machinelearningmas
tery.com/k-fold-cross-validation/.
29. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1). 2001. 5–32 pp.
30. Spang, R. Integrated Safety Management: Creating an All-
Inclusive Electrical Safety Program. IEEE Industry Applications
Magazine. 64-70 pp. 2017. ISSN Online: 1077-2618. DOI:
10.1109/MIAS.2016.2600729.
31. U.S. Department of Energy – Office of Environmental
Management Headquarters (2008). Integrated Safety
Management System Description. 2008. https://energy.go
v/sites/prod/files/em/EMHQISMSDescription5-7-08.pdf
(Accessed 9 May 2020).
32. Rance, S. Defining availability in the real world. 2013.
Available at: https://itsmf.custompublish.com/getfile.php/1283
611.1559.wcsxycquer/Defining+availability+in+the+real+wo
rld.doc
33
.
Primary Paper Section: I
García, I.E.M., Sánchez, A.S. & Barbati, S. Reliability and
Preventive Maintenance. MARE-WINT. New Materials and
Reliability in Offshore Wind Turbine Technology. 235-272 pp.
Springer, 2016. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39095-6.
Secondary Paper Section: IN
- 365 -